🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for AI Training

Observers noted the seeming data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own private free version of Spotify”. He said it could also enable technology firms to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.