🔗 Share this article

What might vicars engage in during their own spare time? Not long ago, this writer ventured with a couple of companions, both other ministers, to see a recently released picture named I Swear. From the trailer, it was clear which the film focused on an individual experiencing Tourette's. What the author didn’t realize was the fact this story was based on a real person: John Davidson, who was featured in a previous 1989 film who later received a royal honor in recognition of his campaigns to teach people regarding the condition as well as assist others with TS.

Understanding Tourette Syndrome

Before that documentary, many individuals did not been aware of the condition. Nearly four decades later, everybody roughly recognizes the basics, yet it remains seen as comic material – particularly within stand-up comedy.

Based on previews, it was evident which the production intended to have its cake and eat it through simultaneously capitalising on the clear humorous aspects from a person uttering socially awkward words at awkward situations and working to further the protagonist's mission in promoting understanding in a respectful and sensitive way. Hopefully it’s not a spoiler to mention it succeeded on both counts – however naturally this realization came after watching.

A Startling Cinema Experience

When the film commenced, a youth sitting ahead from us abruptly exclaimed a string of obscenities. Initially, it appeared this was a gag – albeit a joke highly inappropriate. Yet, it quickly became apparent which here was a real-life person diagnosed with TS: a teenager accompanied by his father.

While the film continued, so did the boy – with no obvious action from neither his dad nor anybody in the theater. I felt slightly torn. Clearly, it was a significant event for the boy and his father to watch the certainly very tough life depicted on the big screen, and I was pleased which they got that opportunity. But was it acceptable that we along with other viewers in the cinema could hardly hear the audio due to the noise? Would the venue have been able to arrange a dedicated session – like most of the chains frequently offer to those with conditions usually?

An Ethical Dilemma

I feel embarrassed to confess which I actually thought about saying something – however, not to the boy’s father personally (I am no heartless), but to staff of the theatre. However, both of the author's clearly more charitable friends appeared to resigned themselves to the situation. Plus, I recalled was the admittedly fictional scene from Extras when Ricky Gervais’s Andy Millman complains about a young person making too much noise in public, unaware that the child has a genetic condition. He barely survived the subsequent public criticism – so my offence might have been much more severe since I knew the teenager literally had no choice.

A Profound Experience

Fortunately, my better nature won over then something extraordinary unfolded over the next hour and a half. First, I just became accustomed to the initially distracting sounds. Then, as the movie approached its conclusion where we saw the incredibly liberating influence that Davidson’s special programs provided on numerous individuals, I experienced humbled as well as extremely fortunate to experience this moment with those who had real experience not only portrayed on screen – even though Robert Aramayo’s acting in the role was excellent , personally, deserving of recognition.

I have experienced comparable situations while watching films before – watching The King’s Speech alongside a friend who stutters and his speech therapist spouse, alternatively encountering real ex-soldiers from D-Day in the foyer following Saving Private Ryan – yet that experience was in a different league. It felt like an immersive experience, but rather than motion seats and splashes touching viewers, the characters were right alongside stating, “This isn’t just a film. It’s my reality.” Then using foul language. An example phrase.

A Positive Conclusion

Therefore I refrained from objecting. When the film ended, I actually went and thanked the teenager – aged fourteen – along with his father, guardian, for the honor of being there, which undoubtedly enriched the film more meaningful than what we expected. Afterwards had a long chat then captured a memory as a group – at that moment the group shouted a rude word alongside the young man.

Closing Insights

I would strongly encourage everyone to view this excellent production and should you’re lucky enough to end up sharing the cinema with a person experiencing Tourette's, {don’t be a nim