🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further review if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in other member states