🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin visited India in the previous decade, the international order was markedly different. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two leaders.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, significantly restricting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that period preceded a significant shift in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by inflammatory statements and the imposition of substantial import duties.

"In this context, the importance of this diplomatic mission to meet Modi cannot be overstated, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a rejection of external pressure," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Two Major Powers

The high-level meeting takes place at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader comes after dismissing recent peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to reported advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its simple happening," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to something resembling normal international relations."

For India, the stakes are even higher. The country faces a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a less engaged United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's peace efforts. This elicited a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable interference.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond originates from the Soviet period and is deeply entrenched, with Moscow long being Delhi's top arms provider. This alliance was largely tolerated by the West before a recent shift.

Over time, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. Yet, recently failed peace efforts, accusations mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in US-India ties.

"In response, India has reverted to its default strategy of 'hedging'," noted a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Beyond international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "Beijing remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its longtime partner.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, shrinking its reliance on Russian equipment from a dominant share to under 40% in recent years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian weaponry to keep the partnership alive, but not become overly reliant that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

Energy and Economic Ties

Enhanced trade relations is expected to be a key agenda item. The Russian leader has recently emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The issue of energy purchases is pivotal. While the Indian government has vowed to continue buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have slowed activity from the private sector. Simultaneously, India has agreed to increase imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson acknowledged "hurdles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would proceed without major disruption. The official downplayed the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "minor" and "temporary" drops and that Russia possesses the "means" to circumvent them.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

As talks proceed, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be mentioned primarily through India's consistent appeal for dialogue and peace.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, India does not possess the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the war," the analyst said. "Beyond urging negotiations, its capacity to effect change is limited."

In the end, despite the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the relationship is fundamentally one of "pure realpolitik," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.