🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the World Series didn't happen during the nail-biting finale on Saturday, when her squad executed one dramatic comeback feat after another before winning in overtime against the opposing team.

It came a game earlier, when two second-tier athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a electrifying, decisive play that at the same time challenged numerous harmful misconceptions promoted about Hispanic people in recent years.

The moment in itself was breathtaking: the outfielder raced in from left field to catch a ball he initially lost in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, game-winning play. Rojas, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a runner collided with him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't merely a remarkable sporting moment, possibly the decisive turn in the series in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for much of the series like the weaker side. To her, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a much-required morale boost for the community and for Los Angeles after a period of enforcement actions, troops patrolling the neighborhoods, and a constant stream of criticism from official sources.

"The players put forth this alternative story," explained Molina. "Everyone saw Latinos showing an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, having a distinct kind of confidence. They're bombastic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"It was such a contrast with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and chased down. It is so simple to be demoralized these days."

However, it's exactly simple to be a team fan nowadays – for Molina or for the legions of other Latinos who show up regularly to matches and fill up as many as half of the stadium's fifty thousand spots each time.

The Complicated Relationship with the Organization

When aggressive immigration raids started in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were sent into the city to respond to ensuing demonstrations, two of the city's sports teams promptly issued messages of support with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

Management stated the Dodgers prefer to stay away of politics – a stance influenced, possibly, by the fact that a sizable portion of the fans, even Latinos, are supporters of certain leaders. Under considerable public pressure, the team later committed $1m in support for families personally affected by the raids but made no official condemnation of the administration.

White House Event and Historical Legacy

Three months earlier, the team did not delay in accepting an invitation to celebrate their 2024 championship win at the White House – a move that sports columnists labeled as "pathetic … weak … and hypocritical", considering the team's boast in having been the pioneering professional franchise to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the frequent references of that legacy and the values it represents by executives and current and former athletes. A number of players such as the coach had voiced unwillingness to travel to the event during the initial period but either reconsidered or gave in to pressure from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Conflicts

A further issue for fans is that the team are owned by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own released balance sheets, involve a stake in a detention corporation that runs enforcement centers. Guggenheim's executives has said many times that it wants to remain neutral of political matters, but its critics say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of acquiescence to certain agendas.

These factors contribute to significant conflicted emotions among Latino supporters in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-won World Series triumph and the ensuing outpouring of team support across the city.

"Is it okay to root for the Dodgers?" area writer Erick Galindo agonized at the start of the playoffs in an thoughtful article ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". Galindo was unable to finally bring himself to view the championship, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he decided his one-man protest must have brought the squad the fortune it required to win.

Separating the Players from the Owners

Many supporters who share similar misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to support the players and its roster of global players, featuring the Asian megastar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the organization's corporate leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the capacity crowd roared in approval of the coach and his athletes but booed the executive and the top official of the investors.

"These men in formal attire do not get to take our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We've been with the team longer than they have."

Historical Context and Neighborhood Effect

The problem, though, goes further than only the team's current owners. The agreement that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s required the municipality razing three low-income Latino communities on a hill above the city center and then selling the land to the team for a small part of its market value. A song on a mid-2000s record that chronicles the events has an low-income parking attendant at the stadium stating that the home he forfeited to removal is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, possibly southern California most influential Mexican American writer and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic relationship between the franchise and its fanbase. He describes the Dodgers the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even harmful following by numerous Latinos" that has been shortchanging its supporters for decades.

"They've acted around Hispanic fans while profiting from them with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to get away with it," the writer wrote over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the team over its absence of reaction to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward fact that attendance at matches did not dip, even at the height of the protests when the city center was subject to a evening restriction.

International Players and Fan Connections

Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {