🔗 Share this article

These days showcase a very distinctive situation: the first-ever US march of the caretakers. They vary in their skills and attributes, but they all possess the same goal – to prevent an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of the fragile ceasefire. After the war ended, there have been rare occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s representatives on the ground. Only recently featured the arrival of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all arriving to perform their assignments.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In just a few short period it launched a wave of operations in Gaza after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military soldiers – resulting, as reported, in many of Palestinian injuries. A number of ministers called for a resumption of the fighting, and the Israeli parliament passed a preliminary decision to incorporate the occupied territories. The American response was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in more than one sense, the US leadership appears more focused on maintaining the present, uneasy phase of the truce than on moving to the subsequent: the rebuilding of Gaza. When it comes to that, it appears the United States may have goals but few tangible strategies.

For now, it remains unclear at what point the suggested multinational governing body will truly take power, and the similar goes for the appointed security force – or even the identity of its members. On a recent day, Vance stated the United States would not force the membership of the international contingent on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet persists to reject one alternative after another – as it did with the Turkish suggestion lately – what happens then? There is also the opposite issue: which party will decide whether the units supported by the Israelis are even willing in the assignment?

The question of the duration it will need to disarm Hamas is similarly ambiguous. “The aim in the leadership is that the international security force is intends to at this point take the lead in demilitarizing the organization,” stated the official lately. “It’s going to take a period.” Trump further highlighted the uncertainty, saying in an discussion a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to lay down arms. So, in theory, the unidentified elements of this yet-to-be-formed international force could enter the territory while Hamas members still remain in control. Would they be dealing with a governing body or a militant faction? Among the many of the questions emerging. Others might question what the result will be for everyday Palestinians under current conditions, with the group continuing to target its own opponents and dissidents.

Recent developments have once again emphasized the blind spots of Israeli reporting on the two sides of the Gazan boundary. Each outlet attempts to scrutinize each potential aspect of the group's violations of the truce. And, usually, the reality that the organization has been hindering the repatriation of the bodies of slain Israeli hostages has dominated the headlines.

On the other hand, reporting of non-combatant casualties in the region caused by Israeli attacks has received minimal notice – if any. Consider the Israeli response actions after Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which a pair of soldiers were fatally wounded. While local authorities claimed 44 casualties, Israeli news analysts complained about the “limited answer,” which hit just installations.

This is typical. During the past few days, the media office alleged Israeli forces of violating the truce with Hamas multiple times after the ceasefire began, causing the death of 38 individuals and harming another many more. The allegation was unimportant to the majority of Israeli news programmes – it was just ignored. That included accounts that eleven members of a Palestinian family were fatally shot by Israeli forces last Friday.

Gaza’s emergency services stated the individuals had been trying to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun area of Gaza City when the bus they were in was attacked for allegedly going over the “demarcation line” that demarcates territories under Israeli military control. That limit is invisible to the human eye and shows up solely on plans and in official records – not always obtainable to ordinary individuals in the territory.

Even that occurrence scarcely received a reference in Israeli journalism. Channel 13 News referred to it in passing on its digital site, quoting an IDF spokesperson who explained that after a suspect transport was spotted, forces shot cautionary rounds towards it, “but the vehicle kept to advance on the soldiers in a fashion that caused an immediate risk to them. The forces opened fire to neutralize the risk, in accordance with the truce.” Zero fatalities were stated.

With such perspective, it is no surprise numerous Israeli citizens think the group exclusively is to at fault for violating the ceasefire. That perception could lead to encouraging demands for a tougher strategy in Gaza.

Sooner or later – maybe in the near future – it will no longer be enough for all the president’s men to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, instructing Israel what to avoid. They will {have to|need